Tattoos Over Stretch Marks

Uses and abuses of half training / 3

Continuing analysis of the Ordinance and subsequent amendments, catches the eye another article, not only slyly glissando, but sometimes broken in a clamorous. Employers can accommodate trainees in relation to the business, the following limits:

a. companies with no more than five permanent employees, a trainee;

b. with a number of permanent staff of between six and nineteen, no more than two trainees at the same time,

c. with more than twenty permanent employees, trainees in no more than ten percent of those employees at the same time.

How many times we happened to observe firms populated by interns beyond the limits allowed by law? And how come no body control to prevent such situations?

scrolling the articles in the decree is nowhere any reference to possible assumptions at the end of the stage, no justified if we consider the internship as a pure moment training, and do not abuse tended to replace "legally" apprenticeship, paid and performed in full optical recruitment. The common formulas "possible inclusion at the end of the stage" to put mo 'of window dressing in the queue many ads are so misleading footnotes in most cases, not required by law and held only enticed the candidate looking for a of certainty post-internship. The companies that really take on interns are actually very few.

What to do? The law should be clearer in many places, particularly in limiting the internship period to the university or the months immediately after graduation (in that case with a refund required) to avoid the systematic replacement of the apprenticeship. For our part, we can decide whether to reject or make fun of us, even painfully, offers an interesting appearance in the name of a series of rights that applied to the stage wildly trampling shameless. As we have seen, the gratuity of the stage, in the light of the original spirit of the law is fully correct. It is not under the circumstances. So boycott unpaid internships may be the first step towards the undermining of a system not affected by crafty interpretations. Because, after all, the work must pay. Always.